Layla Linegar v. Mark Lobanoff, M.D.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2635 ___________________________ Layla M. Linegar lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mark Lobanoff, M.D., and North Suburban Eye Specialists, LLP lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: February 20, 2013 Filed: March 7, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Layla Linegar appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her diversity action asserting state medical tort claims, after Linegar acknowledged that she did not have an expert witness to testify at trial. After careful review, see Schaffart v. ONEOK, Inc., 686 F.3d 461, 470 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of judgment as matter of law is reviewed de novo), we conclude that the dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court, see Fabio v. Bellomo, 504 N.W.2d 758, 762 (Minn. 1993) (expert-testimony requirement for medical-malpractice claim); Reinhardt v. Colton, 337 N.W.2d 88, 96 (Minn. 1983) (expert-testimony requirement for negligent- nondisclosure claim). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. _________________________________ 1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-