United States v. Martin Saldana-Vasquez

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50188

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-04495-WQH

v.
MEMORANDUM *
MARTIN SALDANA-VASQUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013 **

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Martin Saldana-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saldana-Vasquez’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saldana-Vasquez the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 11-50188