De'marian Clemons v. Brian Williams, Sr.

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 23 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT De’MARIAN A. CLEMONS, No. 12-16792 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01518-PMP- PAL v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr.; et al., MEMORANDUM* Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 16, 2013** Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Nevada state prisoner De’Marian A. Clemons appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Clemons’s action because Clemons did not properly exhaust his administrative remedies. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95 (2006) (proper exhaustion is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules). We do not consider Clemons’s allegations concerning retaliation raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. 2 12-16792