dissenting.
“The findings and conclusions in this case suffer from the same infirmities described in my dissents in James Strong, et al. v. United States, Appeal No. 3-74, ante at 958-59, and Appeal No. 4-74, ante at 960. I adopt by reference the views *962expressed there. I do, however, agree with the majority as to its position on the intervention issue.”
The “application” (motion) by the Ottawa appellants for rehearing en banc was denied October 10,1975.