The attorney appointed to represent Santo Leone has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Leone has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Leone’s response. Leone has filed several motions, which this court has considered. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate *432review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED. All outstanding pro se motions are DENIED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.