NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP
______________________
2012-1444
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences No.
90/008,317.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
HAL K. LITCHFORD, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Cald-
well & Berkowitz, PC, of Washington, DC, argued for
appellant. With him on the brief were SUSAN E. SHAW
MCBEE and CHESTER G. MOORE, III, of Washington, DC.
KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria,
Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and LORE A. UNT,
Associate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 14, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk