United States v. Antwan Brown

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 17 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50422 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 8:07-cr-00296-DOC v. MEMORANDUM * ANTWAN EUGENE BROWN, a.k.a. Antwon Eugene Brown, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 14, 2013 ** Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Antwan Eugene Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 64-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Brown’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Brown the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 10-50422