United States v. Mario Anguiano-Silva

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50305 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04850-WQH v. MEMORANDUM * MARIO ANGUIANO-SILVA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 14, 2013 ** Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Mario Anguiano-Silva appeals from the 14-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Anguiano-Silva contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his argument that a lower sentence was justified in light of the length of the sentence imposed for his new 8 U.S.C. § 1326 violation. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The district court explained that a lower sentence would not adequately reflect the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors or appropriately sanction Anguiano-Silva for his breach of the court’s trust. Anguiano-Silva also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Anguiano- Silva’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the section 3583(e) sentencing factors, the below- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 12-50305