LANVlJBH#@ No. 30667 lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAl‘l CHRIS GRlNDLING, PetitiOner, VS. SECOND CIRCUlT COURT, STATE OF HAWAITQ ORIGINAL PROCEEDlNG (S.P. NO. O9~l-OO8l) 01 =|~ Hc§ 53 SRV H~!BZ ORDER Acoba, and Recktenwald, JJ.) Duffy, C.J., Nakayama, (By: Moon, Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of it appears that See HRS § 634J- mandamus filed by petitioner Chris Grindlinq, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. 7(c); ln Re DisciplinarV Bd. Of Hawaii Supreme Court, 9l Hawafi 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (l999) (Mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available.) Accordingly, lT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT lS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED; Honolulu, HawaiUq August 25, 2010_ ¢,,.4 a @1sz»»x»’\l:) \3!~»» =» w`»@@,. Q~ /K?7¢¢N /Z<éC§¢2¢¢o€z?// § n Y
Grindling v.Second Circuit Court, State of Hawaii
Combined Opinion