State v. Larsen

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AN]) PACIFIC REPORTER NO. 29885 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS oF THE sTATE oF HAWAI‘I STATE oF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARIC P. LARSEN, Defendant-Appellant 9§=1. £~J‘*»f? S‘Z HQ’E‘B§UZ ,.‘ 1 irc § APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CASE NO. 1DTA-08-O9599) SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Foley, Presiding Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.) Defendant-Appellant Aric P. Larsen (Larsen) appeals from the Judgment entered against him on May 2l, 2009, in the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division (District Larsen was convicted of Operating a Vehicle Under the Court).F in violation of Hawaii Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII), and (b) (Supp. 2009). Revised Statutes § 291E-6l(a) that the On appeal, Larsen contends, inter alia, District Court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the charge because the written complaint and oral charge for OVUII failed to state an essential element of the offense, i.e., that Larsen operated or assumed actual physical control of a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway. Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to we the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, resolve Larsen's points of error as follows: "[T]he operation of a vehicle on a public way, street, road, or highway is an attendant circumstance of the offense of State v. OVUII, and is therefore an element of the offense." The Honorable Len0re H. Lee presided. l|-‘ \ NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPOIRTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Whee1er, 121 HaWaiH_383, 393, 219 P.3d 1170, 1180 failure to allege that Larsen was driving a vehicle upon way, street, road, or highway at the time of the offense Id. the charge must the charge deficient. Accordingly, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. we need not address other points of error. Therefore, the District Court's May 2l, (2009). The a public rendered be Larsen's 2009 Judgment is vacated and this case is remanded to the District Court for dismissal of the OVUII charge without prejudice. Honolulu, HawaFi, April 28, 20lO. Presiding Judge ‘ &¢.,,¢A»/@;.. DATED: On the briefs: Timothy I. Mac Master for Defendant-Appellant Anne K. Clarkin Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for Plaintiff~Appellee Associate Jud