L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date filed: 1912-06-07
Citations: 197 F. 536
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
PER CURIAM.

It is equitable that the penholders which the defendant has in good faith marked in accordance with Judge Hand’s-decree with the .suffix “not connected with the original Waterman 'pen,” or in accordance with the opinion of. this court before the use of the name “Arthur” was required, should • be permitted to be; sold and the order for the mandate may so provide.

The application for further changes in the order is denied.