IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40706
Conference Calendar
__________________
WINFRED RAY RANDALL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
NEAL BIRMINGHAM,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:95-80
- - - - - - - - - -
February 29, 1996
Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights
complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He
contends that the district court erred by determining that his
complaint was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. We
have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge's report and
recommendation, and the district court's order, and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the
reasons given by the district court. Randall v. Birmingham, No.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-40706
-2-
2:95-80 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 1995). We caution Randall that any
additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will
invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Randall
is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that
they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
AFFIRMED.