DA 12-0110 December 26 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
2012 MT 308N
CREED MILES EVANS,
Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant,
v.
STEVEN D. DOW, d/b/a KEIN-AM;
and MUNSON RADIO, INC.,
Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-Appellee,
and ROAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;
and STARadio, INC., KEIN-AM, INC.,
Defendants.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District,
In and For the County of Cascade, Cause No. ADV 05-122
Honorable Thomas M. McKittrick, Presiding Judge
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellant:
Steven T. Potts; Steven T. Potts, PLLC; Great Falls, Montana
For Appellee:
Creed Miles Evans, self-represented; Great Falls, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: December 4, 2012
Decided: December 26, 2012
Filed:
__________________________________________
Clerk
Justice Jim Rice delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules,
this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as
precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court’s quarterly
list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.
¶2 Steven D. Dow and Munson Radio, Inc. (Dow) appeal from the orders culminating in the
judgment entered against them by the District Court, awarding Creed Miles Evans (Evans)
compensatory damages in the amount of $112,397.23, attorney fees in the amount of $19,600,
and costs.
¶3 Dow owns and broadcasts from a radio station known as KEIN-AM from a location on
real property owned by Evans in Great Falls. Evans’ predecessors in interest leased the KEIN-
AM radio tower, transmitter, studio site, access thereto, parking, and other improvements, to
Roan Communications, which subsequently assigned the lease to Dow. In this way Evans and
Dow have become parties to the lease.
¶4 In 2004, high winds damaged the studio. The lease obligated the tenant to make repairs,
and Evans gave notice of this obligation. Dow did not immediately initiate repairs, and although
a roofing company worked on the roof, substantial water damage was done to the building’s
interior. Additional damage was caused by a leaking air conditioner and tar used by the roofers
that seeped into the interior. Evans testified and the District Court concluded that Dow’s failure
to timely complete repairs led to extensive water and tar damage, which in turn caused molding
and mildewing of the building’s walls.
¶5 The fence surrounding the radio tower collapsed. Evans sent a notice of Dow’s
obligation to repair the fence and later a notice of default demanding that Dow repair the fence in
2
accordance with the lease and governing federal regulations. Evans testified that the fence no
longer served to secure the station and presented a danger. Evans made repairs to the fence a
number of times, and provided some seven notices of default over a four year period about the
fence. He later surrounded the fence with a chain-link fence.
¶6 The District Court found that Dow had precluded Evans from entering the building to
inspect the premises, failed to carry comprehensive liability insurance coverage as required by
the lease, and failed to make other necessary repairs. It found that Dow had “persistently put up
roadblocks to discovery in this case,” “has not cooperated in good faith and has continued to
engage in discovery abuses,” and “has failed to comply with the Court’s orders.” The District
Court noted “Defendants’ uncooperative, stonewalling attitude throughout the course of the
proceedings.” The District Court held in Evans’ favor on the substantive liability issues of the
case, but also concluded that Dow’s litigation abuses justified granting Evans’ motion for
judgment by default as a sanction against Dow. The District Court then conducted a hearing on
damages, and awarded damages as set forth above.
¶7 On appeal, Dow challenges the District Court’s: entry of a judgment by default; findings
of fact and conclusions of law regarding the substantive legal issues; determination that Steven
D. Dow is personally liable to Evans; admission of Evans’ expert testimony; and award of
attorney fees to Evans in the amount of $19,600 pursuant to the lease agreement, which the
District Court reduced from the $53,492.25 Evans’ counsel had billed him. Evans cross appeals,
arguing that Dow’s appeal should be dismissed for lack of standing.
¶8 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d) of our
Internal Operating Rules, which provides for noncitable memorandum opinions. The District
3
Court’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence and the legal issues are controlled
by settled Montana law, which the District Court correctly interpreted.
¶9 Affirmed.
/S/ JIM RICE
We concur:
/S/ MIKE McGRATH
/S/ MICHAEL E WHEAT
/S/ BETH BAKER
/S/ BRIAN MORRIS
4