Savage v. Franklin

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 95-10888 Summary Calendar _____________________ RICHARD D. SAVAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus G. FRANKLIN; R. HUDSON, Warden; M. W. MOORE, Regional Director; JOHN STICE, Deputy Director, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:95-CV-19 _________________________________________________________________ March 14 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Richard D. Savage argues that he did not receive a fair prison disciplinary hearing because there was no evidence presented to support the determination that he had attempted to escape from the prison. We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district court, and the brief, and find that the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous should be affirmed substantially for the reasons * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. stated by the district court. See Savage v. Franklin, No. 2:95-CV-19 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 1995). A F F I R M E D. -2-