State v. Moore

Judge BECTON

concurring in the result.

Because, and only because, of our Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. Bagley, 321 N.C. 201, 362 S.E. 2d 244 (1987), and State v. Smith, 321 N.C. 290, 362 S.E. 2d 159 (1987), I am compelled to concur in the result.