C' de Baca v. C' de Baca

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 DAVID LORENZO C’ DE BACA, 8 Petitioner-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 30,483 10 VICTORIA VASYLIVNA C’ DE BACA, 11 Respondent-Appellee. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 13 John F. Davis, District Judge 14 David Lorenzo C’ de Baca 15 Corrales, NM 16 Pro se Appellant 17 Victoria Vasylivna C’ de Baca 18 Rio Rancho, NM 19 Pro se Appellee 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 CASTILLO, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 Affirmed. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 ___________________________________ 7 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 __________________________________ 10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 11 __________________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2