1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please
2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated
4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does
5 not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 CLAUDIO MOYA, NORA MOYA, FIDEL
8 VALLEJOS, TONY A. CHAVEZ, HERMAN
9 MIRELES, GLORIA ASKEN, ELIZABETH
10 DIAZ, JAMES BARELA, MANUEL OTERO,
11 DEMETRIO CHAVEZ, ESTHER MARTINEZ,
12 EDDIE AYON, HERMAN CHAVEZ,
13 CHRISTOPHER HIGGINS, PATRICK BACA,
14 MELISSA J. SANCHEZ, LYDIA A. PIRO,
15 CHRIS L. MONTOYA, MICHELLE BACA,
16 SANDRA L. MONTOYA, MICHELLE GONZALES,
17 JOANN M. CHAVEZ, PHILIP BACA, DUSTIN
18 ARMSTRONG, JOSE M. TRILLO, PAUL
19 GONZALES, CLOVIS TORRES, REGINA
20 CHAVEZ, MARY MOYA, YVETTE
21 GONZALES, RICKI ARMSTRONG,
22 REUBEN CHAVEZ, JULIA GALLEGOS,
23 PETE GALLEGOS, EARL C. GLEASON,
24 and DARLA K. GLEASON,
25 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
26 v. NO. 30,877
27 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
28 OF VALENCIA COUNTY and VALENCIA
29 HEALTH COMMONS, a New Mexico
30 corporation,
31 Defendants-Appellees.
32 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY
33 George P. Eichwald, District Judge
2
1 James Lawrence Sánchez Trial Lawyer, PC
2 James Lawrence Sánchez
3 Belen, NM
4 for Appellant
5 Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A.
6 Arthur D. Melendres
7 Zachary L. McCormick
8 Albuquerque, NM
9 for Appellee Board of County Commissioners of Valencia County
10 Sanchez, Mowrer & Desiderio, P.C.
11 Robert J. Desiderio
12 Albuquerque, NM
13 for Appellee Valencia Health Commons
14 MEMORANDUM OPINION
15 VIGIL, Judge.
16 Plaintiffs are local residents and taxpayers of Valencia County. Although
17 Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Valencia County (the Board) and
18 Defendant Valencia Health Commons (Health Commons) (collectively, Defendants)
19 argued for dismissal on more than one ground [RP 96, 109, 126, 192], the order of
20 dismissal was entered on the sole basis that Plaintiffs lack standing to bring this
21 action. [RP 227] Plaintiffs contend that they have standing as local residents and
22 property taxpayers to challenge the Board’s recent payment of $30,000 to Health
23 Commons to extend the contract to build a new hospital and emergency room in
3
1 Valencia County that previously had been authorized by Valencia County voters. [DS
2 6-7] Plaintiffs also contend that standing should be conferred upon them by the
3 “Great Public Importance Doctrine.” [DS 8-10]
4 This Court’s calendar notice proposed to affirm the district court’s order of
5 dismissal. [Ct. App. File, CN1] The Board has filed a memorandum in support of
6 the proposed disposition. [Ct. App. File, MIS] Plaintiffs have not responded to the
7 calendar notice, and the time for doing so has passed. For the reasons set forth in the
8 calendar notice, we affirm the district court’s order of dismissal.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 _________________________
11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
12 WE CONCUR:
13 _________________________________
14 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
15 _________________________________
16 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
4