concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I would simply affirm the judgment of the district court. I believe that the award of expenses related to the petition for cer-*1280tiorari is within the discretion of the district court. 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
Akbar v. Fairman
Related Cases
- Sampath K. Hemmige, and Cross-Appellee v. Chicago Public Schools, and Cross-Appellants
- Jamal Ali Akbar and Melvin Nalls, Cross-Appellees v. James Fairman, Paul Hosier, Mary Catherine Noonan, Andres Martinez and Robert K. Hanson, Cross-Appellants
- Paganis v. Blonstein
- United States of America Ex Rel. Nathaniel Spurlark, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dennis Wolff, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
- Rafael Garcia v. City of Chicago, Illinois, Anna Gall, County of Cook