Stewart v. Stewart

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 HONEY STEWART, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, 4 v. No. 31,579 5 JOHN MICHAEL STEWART, 6 Respondent-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY 8 Louis E. Depauli, Jr., District Judge 9 Rabb & Beal PLLC 10 Lloyd Rabb, III 11 Tucson, AZ 12 for Appellee 13 John Michael Stewart 14 Gallup, NM 15 Pro se Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 Affirmed. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge 11 12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 2