State v. Mayfield

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 31,166 5 TAMARA LOIS MAYFIELD, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY 8 Teddy L. Hartley, District Judge 9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Tamara Lois Mayfield 13 Clovis, NM 14 Pro Se Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 VANZI, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 _______________________________ 7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2