State v. Olguin

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 3 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 4 Plaintiff-Appellee, 5 v. No. 31,659 6 THEODORE O. OLGUIN, 7 Defendant-Appellant. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 9 Richard Brown, District Judge 10 Gary K. King, Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Jacqueline Cooper, Chief Public Defender 14 J. K. Theodosia Johnson, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation and imposing judgment 2 and sentence. We proposed to affirm in a notice of proposed summary disposition. 3 Defendant has filed a timely memorandum in opposition. After reviewing 4 Defendant’s memorandum in opposition, we remain unpersuaded and thus affirm the 5 order revoking his probation and imposing judgment and sentence. 6 In his docketing statement, Defendant challenged the sufficiency of the 7 evidence to support the district court’s finding that he violated the terms of his 8 probation. See State v. Sanchez, 2001-NMCA-060, ¶ 11, 130 N.M. 602, 28 P.3d 1143 9 (stating that, in a probation revocation proceeding, the State bears the burden of 10 establishing a violation with reasonable certainty). In our notice, we reviewed the 11 evidence introduced at the probation revocation hearing and proposed to affirm. In 12 his memorandum in opposition, Defendant has failed to challenge our review of the 13 evidence presented or the analysis contained in our proposed disposition. Therefore, 14 for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm the 15 district court’s order revoking Defendant’s probation and imposing judgment and 16 sentence. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 2 3 1 WE CONCUR: 2 3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 4 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 4