United States v. Francisco Gomez-Vasquez

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10390

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01886-DCB

v. MEMORANDUM *

FRANCISCO GOMEZ-VASQUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013 **

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Gomez-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment

revoking supervised release and the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Vasquez’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Vasquez has filed a pro se supplemental

brief. The government has filed a motion for summary affirmance.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The government’s motion for

summary affirmance is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

2 12-10390