IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40707
Conference Calendar
__________________
CALVIN WAYNE COPELAND,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DEWITT COUNTY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. V-95-37
- - - - - - - - - -
April 16, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Calvin Wayne Copeland appeals the district court's dismissal
as frivolous of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil
rights complaint. Copeland argues that his civil rights were
violated because his state-court negligence suit was
unsuccessful.
Copeland "may not seek a reversal in federal court of the
state court judgment simply by recasting his complaint in the
form of a civil rights action." Reed v. Terrell, 759 F.2d 472,
473 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 946 (1985).
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-40707
-2-
This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because
the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Copeland is warned that any future frivolous filing will invite
the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Copeland should
review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise
arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED