As this case is certain to go to the supreme court, X shall merely state the conclusion to which I have arrived. The act of February 15, 1S55 [Laws Ill. 1855, p. 249], created a corporation by the name of the Mt Vernon Railroad Company, with power to construct a railroad from Mt. Vernon to the Illinois Central Railroad. The corporation designated Ashley as the other terminus of its road. This line of road was all within the counties of Jefferson and Washington. Another act of the same date created a corporation, by the name of the Belle-ville and Fairfield Railroad Company, with power to construct a railroad from Belleville by way of Mt. Vernon to Fairfield in Wayne county. The charter of the Mt. Vernon Railroad Company provided that “any county through which said road may run, and every county through which any other railroad may run, with which this road may be joined, connected or intersected, may, and is hereby authorized and empowered to aid in the construction of the same, or of such other road with which it may so connect,” by disposing of its swamp lands for that purpose. The first clause of this provision embraces only the counties of Jefferson and Washington, as they are the only counties through which the Mt. Vernon road runs. The second clause embraces every county through which any railroad runs with which the Mt. Vernon Railroad is joined, connected or intersected. In April, 1859, the Mt. Vernon Railroad Company issued construction bonds amounting to 8800,000, and, at the same time the county of Wayne executed a mortgage of its swamp lands as security for the payment of the bonds. The charter conferred no authority on the Mt. Vernon Railroad Company to extend its line of road east of Mt. Vernon; uof did it ever acquire that right by virtue of any consolidation with the Belleville and Fair-field Railroad Company.
The question therefore arises, was there such a connection between the Mt. Vernon, and Belleville and Fairfield roads, as authorizes the county of Wayne to mortgage its swamp lands as security for the payment of the construction bonds of the Mt. Vernon Railroad Company? In my opinion, this question must be answered in the negative. The case fails to show that any arrangement was ever made by the two companies for a connection of their roads at Mt. Vernon. Such a connection was the proper subject matter of contract between them. They had the power to form the connection, but the power was never exercised. It is true that the line of the Belleville and Fairfield road passed through Mt. Vernon, and that the line of the Mt. Vernon road terminated at that place. But it by no means follows, that any connection whatever existed between them. Without some binding arrangement between the two companies for a connection at Mt. Vernon, the two lines of road would necessarily remain unconnected. The law contemplated an actual connection — such a connection as would enable the two roads to be operated as one line from Fairfield to the Central Railroad. Until such a connection was established, the county of Wayne had no power to aid in the construction of the Mt. Vernon Railroad. As such a connection was never formed, the mortgage in question was executed without authority of law.
The bill must be dismissed.