UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1148
SHANEKA SHARDAY FLOURNOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKFORCE,
Office of General Counsel; EXEL INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District
Judge. (7:12-cv-03267-TMC)
Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaneka Sharday Flournoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shaneka Sharday Flournoy appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on her complaint alleging employment
discrimination and wrongful denial of unemployment insurance
benefits. The district court referred this case to a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.
2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied
and advised Flournoy that failure to file timely and specific
objections to this recommendation would waive appellate review
of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a
magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve
appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the parties have been warned of the consequences of
noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th
Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Flournoy has waived appellate review by failing to file
objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2