State v. Young

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. URIAN YOUNG, Petitioner. No. 1 CA-CR 22-0532 PRPC FILED 4-4-2023 Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR1994-010928 The Honorable Scott S. Minder, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent Urian Young, San Luis Petitioner STATE v. YOUNG Decision of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION Acting Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Michael S. Catlett and Judge Anni Hill Foster delivered the decision of the Court. PER CURIAM: ¶1 Petitioner Urian Young seeks review of the superior court’s order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s fourth petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief. AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: AA 2