Case: 22-60172 Document: 00516713833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2023
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 22-60172 FILED
April 17, 2023
____________
Lyle W. Cayce
Courtney R. Logan, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Mississippi Department of Corrections; Haley Barbour,
former governor; Nathan Burlcain; John Doe, warden;
Timothy Jones, assistant district attorney; Ricky Banks, sheriff of
Leflore County; Trina Burris, Mississippi Department of Corrections;
John Zimmermann, assistant district attorney Tennessee,
Defendants—Appellees.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:21-CV-35
______________________________
Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
For at least the fifth time, Courtney Logan challenges the legality of
his extraditions between the states of Tennessee and Mississippi. See Logan
v. State, 311 So. 3d 724 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021). This court has twice “warned
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-60172 Document: 00516713833 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2023
No. 22-60172
Logan that submitting frivolous or repetitive filings challenging his
extradition could subject him to sanctions.” In re Logan, No. 21-60156, 3 (5th
Cir. May 5, 2021) (citing In re Logan, No. 15-60658, 1-2 (5th Cir. Nov. 20,
2015)). In fact, in order to get around his three strikes which would otherwise
have prevented him from raising this claim, Logan paid the filing fee for this
case.
Like his previous attempts to challenge his extraditions in state and
federal court, Courtney’s present filing is frivolous and wholly without merit.
This appeal shall be dismissed and Logan is again WARNED that any future
frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings in this court or any court
subject to this court’s jurisdiction will subject him to additional and
progressively more severe sanctions, including monetary sanctions and
further restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court
subject to this court’s jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.
2