Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-23-00017-CR
Hector Enrique LARA-SANCHEZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2022CR3039
Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 12, 2023
DISMISSED
In the clerk’s record for this appeal, the trial court’s certification states “this criminal case
is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It also contains a written plea
bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the
prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Under Rule 25.2, if the clerk’s record does not contain “a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal,” this court must dismiss this appeal. Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez
v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
04-23-00017-CR
On February 17, 2012, we notified Appellant that this appeal would be dismissed under
Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of
appeal was made part of the appellate record by March 20, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d),
37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110
S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). To date, no response has been filed.
Because no response has been filed that contains an amended trial court certification
showing that Appellant has the right of appeal, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this
appeal. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels, 110 S.W.3d at 176. Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish
-2-