DENIED and Opinion Filed May 3, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-23-00397-CV
IN RE 1 COVENTRY COURT, LLC, MOSHE FELDHENDLER, AND
LEAH FELDHENDLER, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-01541
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel
Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
In their May 1, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators seek relief from
the trial court’s contempt order.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to demonstrate that the trial
court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). Relators bear the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record
to show they are entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.
1992) (orig. proceeding).
Relators’ record does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(2). Without a
sufficient record, relators have failed to carry their burden.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/Bill Pedersen, III//
230397f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III
JUSTICE
–2–