United States v. Patten

Mr. Justice Lurton,

dissenting.

The majority seem to base a judgment, of reversal upon the assumption that the court below interpreted the counts in question as charging all the elements essential to. a technical “corner.” To this view of the opinion of the court below I do . not assent. As I interpret that opinion the court held the count bad because it did not charge a “corner.” Thus interpreted -there was no error in quashing'the count. I am authorized to say that the Chief Justice concurs in this dissent.

Mr. Justice Holmes also dissénts.