IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-10167
Summary Calendar
__________________
JOHN MCCOY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ANN RICHARDS; GEORGE W. BUSH; JOHN DOE;
DAN MORALES, Attorney General; JAMES A. COLLINS;
WAYNE SCOTT, Director; S.O. WOODS;
RICHARD BELENGER, Warden; JAMES DUKE; CARL RAGSDALE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:95-CV-179
- - - - - - - - - -
May 8, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John McCoy seeks review of three orders of the district
court. First, he appeals the denial of his motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and McCoy's
brief and AFFIRM the district court's denial of the motion
essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy
v. Richards, No. 1:95-CV-179-C (N.D. Tex., Jan. 19, 1996).
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-10167
-2-
Second, McCoy appeals the denial of his motion for
preliminary injunction. McCoy has not shown irreparable injury
warranting a preliminary injuction, and the district court did
not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See Black Fire
Fighters Ass'n v. City of Dallas, 905 F.2d 63, 65 (5th Cir.
1990). The denial of the motion is AFFIRMED.
Third, McCoy seeks to appeal the denial of his motion to
protect exhibits. The order denying this motion is not
appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1292(a); Lakedreams v.
Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). The appeal of the
denial of this motion is DISMISSED.