Mitchell Paul Dobrenen v. United States

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the result herein on the ground that the résumé of the investigative report given the registrant Dobre-nen was not a fair summary of the report and recommendation furnished the Appeal Board of the Selective Service System at Los Angeles by the Department of Justice. The summary is not particularly adverse to the registrant; the full report is.

I am not sure that if the résumé had been an accurate summary of the recommendation that Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407, 75 S.Ct. 409, 99 L.Ed. 467, would require us to reverse. Of course, as pointed out by Judge Stephens, the trial court did not have the advantage of the Gonzales case which was handed down after the trial.

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge, concurring.

I concur in the result.