(dissenting).
In my opinion the reasoning and conclusion reflected in the following ex*197cerpt from the opinion of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board are sound:
“The marks in their entireties do not look alike; they do not sound alike and they do not have similar connotations.
“The products are likely to be ordered by the word marks ‘Union’ and ‘Columbian’. The words ‘World Wide Service’ in applicant’s mark and the words ‘Tanks for the World’ in opposer’s mark suggest that both parties do world wide business, but this is insufficient to support a finding that applicant’s mark so resembles opposer’s as to be likely, when applied to metal tanks, to cause confusion or mistake of purchasers.”
I would affirm.