The differences in sound, appearance and suggestive connotation of the marks in issue are sufficient, in my opinion, to warrant affirmance of the board’s decision without considering the differences in the goods and without relying on the so-called “discriminating purchaser” theory.
General Precision, Inc. v. Tab T. Thein, by Change of Name From Tibor J. Thein, D.B.A. Lib-Re-Search Service
Related Cases
- Star Watch Case Co. v. Mido G. Schaeren & Co., S.A., by Change of Name From Societe Anonyme Mido, by Mesne Assignments From Mido Societe Anonyme
- Guardian Light Company v. Guardian Electric Manufacturing Co.
- General Aniline & Film Corporation v. Hukill Chemical Corporation
- General Precision, Inc. v. Tab T. Thein, by Change of Name From Tibor J. Thein, D.B.A. Lib-Re-Search Service
- Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company