dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
The sentencing judge upon the record now before us after reviewing the same stated:
Accordingly, I hold that, since the Petitioner in this case has been timely accorded “meaningful consideration” of his application for parole, my expectations concerning the § 4208(a)(2) sentence imposed have not been thwarted.
Under the circumstances I see no reason for remanding this matter to the district court for further hearing. See Gravink v. United States, 549 F.2d 1152 (8th Cir. 1977).
APPENDIX “A”
[[Image here]]
[42 Fed.Reg. 39815 (1977) (to be codified at 28 C.F.R. § 2.20).]
APPENDIX “B”
[[Image here]]
*950[[Image here]]
[42 Fed.Reg. 39813-14 (1977) (to be-codified at 28 C.F.R. § 2.20).]