concurring.
I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm, but do not share all the views expressed in the majority opinion.
I conclude that the admission of Johnson’s testimony from the suppression hearing was error. The issues at the suppression hearing did not concern the ownership of the gun in the glove box; Odom did not have a similar motive to develop Johnson’s testimony at the suppression hearing. Nevertheless, I conclude that in light of Odom’s statements to the police, the error in admitting the testimony was harmless.