(dissenting). Although I understand the merits of the arguments presented by both the majority and Justice HATHAWAY’s dissent, at this time and in this particular case, I am more persuaded by the reasoning and result of the dissent.
Holman v. RASAK
Related Cases
- United States v. Frank Soyka
- Application of Peter P. Noznick, Charles W. Tatter and Carl F. Obenauf
- Intracoastal Transportation, Inc., and Anderson Marine Construction, Inc. v. Decatur County, Georgia, Department of Transportation
- Diane Doe, Etc. v. Omer Renfrow, Etc.
- John H. Robbins v. United States Railroad Retirement Board