(concurring in part). I concur in the order affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals. I write separately, as I did in In re Rood, 483 Mich 73, 125 (2009) (Weaver, J., concurring in part) because I agree with Justice Young, post at 940, that as there were numerous state law violations requiring reversal of the termination order, this Court should not consider additional constitutional issues.