(dissenting in part). I dissent from the majority’s decision to deny rehearing. I previously joined Justice Kelly in her concurrence/dissent to the majority’s affirmance of the Court of Appeals decision regarding the appropriate statute of limitations. People v Monaco, 474 Mich 48 (2006). I dissented from section IV and the conclusion of the majority opinion because I believed that the Court of Appeals was correct when it found that felony nonsupport is a continuing violation. Consequently, I would have affirmed the conclusions of the Court of Appeals. For these same reasons, I would grant the Attorney General’s motion for rehearing.