concurring in result.
Because of the doctrine of stare decisis, I concur in the result reached by the ma*492jority. Both Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc., 621 N.E.2d 1078 (Ind. 1993), and Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc., 621 N.E.2d 1069 (Ind.1993), compel the outcome in this case.
DICKSON, J., concurs.