Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

*70Quinn, P. J.

(concurring in part). I concur in the result and agree with the analysis and the holding on the damage issue.

Since I dissented in Allen v Michigan Bell Telephone Co, 18 Mich App 632; 171 NW2d 689 (1969), I do not feel bound by it. For this reason I dissent from the result reached by the majority opinion on the first issue.