State v. Hansen

Andersen, C.J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur in part I of the dissenting opinion. However, like the Court of Appeals, I conclude that the evidence admitted at trial was sufficient for the trier of fact to determine, as it *723did, that the defendant intended or knew his threat would be communicated to Judge Dixon; for this reason, I concur with the majority's affirmance of the conviction.