concurring in part and dissenting in part.
For the reasons expressed in my dissent in State v. Curtis, — Idaho -, — P.2d -, Docket No. 21814, 1996 WL 648875 (Ct.App. Nov. 8, 1996), I dissent from the majority opinion’s conclusion that any error in failing to instruct the jury on lesser included offenses is inherently harmless. I concur in the remainder of the opinion.