I concur in both the judgment and the reasoning upon which it is based, with the qualification that
*600I do not join in any implication, if there be such, that California could constitutionally (by “a plain legislative direc7 tion,” or otherwise) require as a condition of upholding contracts made in other states by residents of those states that the parties to such contracts comply with California’s “reasonable investigation” statute.
Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied June 19, 1957.