specially concurring.
I do not necessarily concur in the majority opinion’s conclusions as to the effect of Oregon Laws 1971, ch 280, § 29. See, State ex rel Town Concrete v. Andersen, 264 Or 565, 505 P2d 1162 (1973). See also, Sharp v. Sharp, 12 Or App 421, 507 P2d 417 (1973). Nevertheless, I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion because it reaches the appropriate result on the issues of substance under either the “old” or “new” law.
Fort, J., joins in this specially concurring opinion.