Hilt v. Roslyn Volunteer Fire Co.

Dissenting Opinion

by Mb. Justice Eagen :

I dissent.

In my view, our Court should follow the lead of courts in other jurisdictions and adopt a more enlightened rule as to what constitutes an “accident.” For *155example, see Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co., 27 N.J. 127, 141 A. 2d 761 (1958).

Mr. Justice Roberts joins in this dissent.