concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I would affirm the trial court’s judgment by holding that the underlying jury verdict is protected against court-ordered remit-titur by Art. 2, § 19, Okla. Const., and by the provisions of 23 O.S.Supp.1986 § 9.
SIMMS and HARGRAVE, JJ., concurring in part, dissenting in part.