Lyman v. NATIONAL MORTGAGE BOND CORPORATION

HENRIOD, Justice

(concurring).

I concur, but on the simple fact that, by failure to pay the taxes required by the statute, plaintiffs did not prove their case, and the court should have entered a no cause of action judgment. To discuss constitutional problems raised, which I think are unnecessary for this decision, seems only to confuse rather than to clarify here.

McDONOUGH, C. J., concurs in the concurring opinion of HENRIOD, J.