(concurring). I do not agree with Mr. Justice Black’s analysis of our majority’s opinion in A’Eno v. Lowry, 367 Mich 657. There, as here, and unlike Fordon v. Bender, 363 Mich 124, and Mosley v. Dati, 363 Mich 690, the proofs were such that the fact finders properly could conclude that some of the medical expenses claimed were not attributable to injuries received by the plaintiff in the collision involved in the litigation.
I concur in affirmance in the case at bar for the reasons stated in the last 3 sentences of the penultimate paragraph of Mr. Justice Black’s opinion.
Carr, C. J., and Dethmers and Adams, JJ., concurred with Souris, J.