State v. Holmes

SCHWAB, C. J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion, but wish to note that as to the search and seizure issue my concurrence in the result should not be construed to indicate that I concur fully in the reasoning that led to it. See my concurring opinion in State v. Williams, 17 Or App 513, 522 P2d 1213 (1974). In my opinion, the search in the case at bar turned simply on the point that the events which took place at the time of the defendant’s apprehension gave the police probable cause to believe that defendant then had drugs on his person.